Skip to main content

Offensive360 vs Checkmarx — SAST Comparison

Compare Offensive360 and Checkmarx for static application security testing. See how they differ in deployment flexibility, pricing models, DAST capabilities, and AI-powered analysis.

Overview

Both Offensive360 and Checkmarx are enterprise-grade application security testing platforms. Checkmarx is one of the longest-established SAST vendors, now offering Checkmarx One as a cloud-native platform alongside its legacy CxSAST on-premise product. This comparison covers the key differences to help you decide which fits your needs.

Important note: This comparison is based on publicly available information. We’ve aimed to be fair and accurate, but product capabilities change. We recommend verifying specific features with each vendor before making a decision.

Quick comparison

FeatureOffensive360Checkmarx
Primary focusSecurity (SAST + DAST)Application security (SAST, SCA, IaC, Secrets)
SASTYesYes
DASTYes (built-in)Limited (via partnerships)
Languages (built-in)10+25–35+ (varies by product)
AI-powered analysisYes (7 additional languages)Yes (AI-assisted remediation)
On-premise deploymentYes (OVA appliance)Yes (CxSAST on-prem; Checkmarx One is cloud-first)
Cloud/SaaSYesYes (Checkmarx One)
Air-gapped deploymentYesLimited
CI/CD integrationGitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure, Jenkins, CircleCIGitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure, Jenkins, and more
Pricing modelPer-project/instancePer-application or per-developer (custom quotes)
Open source tierNoNo

Where Offensive360 may be a better fit

Combined SAST + DAST in one platform

Checkmarx is primarily a static analysis platform. While Checkmarx One includes SCA, IaC scanning, and secrets detection, it does not include a built-in DAST engine. Organizations needing both SAST and DAST would need to pair Checkmarx with a separate DAST tool. Offensive360 provides both in a single platform with unified reporting.

Simpler on-premise deployment

Offensive360 ships as a ready-to-run OVA virtual appliance — import it into VMware or any hypervisor and start scanning in minutes. Checkmarx’s on-premise option (CxSAST) requires dedicated infrastructure, database setup, and more involved configuration. Checkmarx One is primarily cloud-native, and on-premise deployments may incur additional infrastructure and maintenance costs.

Air-gapped environments

For classified or highly regulated environments with no network access, Offensive360 operates fully offline via its OVA appliance. Checkmarx One’s cloud-native architecture makes true air-gapped deployment more challenging.

Transparent pricing

Checkmarx pricing is custom-quoted and often cited as expensive by users. Offensive360 uses a per-project/instance model without per-developer pricing, which can be more predictable for organizations with large development teams.

AI-powered coverage for niche languages

Offensive360 uses AI-powered analysis for Kotlin, Swift, Objective-C, Dart, C/C++, Apex, and Oracle Forms — languages where traditional rule-based engines may have limited coverage. This can detect security patterns that static rules miss.

Where Checkmarx may be a better fit

Broader built-in language support

Checkmarx supports 25–35+ languages with built-in rules (depending on the product version). Offensive360 covers 17+ languages (10 built-in + 7 AI-powered), so Checkmarx has broader native language coverage.

Mature enterprise ecosystem

Checkmarx has been in the SAST market since 2006 and has a large customer base, extensive integrations, and established relationships with enterprise buyers. It has a deeper ecosystem of IDE plugins, workflow integrations, and compliance reporting.

Comprehensive AppSec platform

Checkmarx One combines SAST, SCA, IaC scanning, secrets detection, and API security in a single cloud-native platform. Offensive360 focuses on SAST + DAST but does not currently include SCA or secrets scanning.

Industry recognition

Checkmarx consistently appears in Gartner’s Magic Quadrant and Forrester Wave reports as a leader in application security testing. This can matter for organizations that weight analyst recognition in procurement decisions.

Custom query language

Checkmarx offers CxQL, a custom query language that allows security teams to write highly specific rules tailored to their codebase. This provides granular control for advanced users.

The bottom line

Choose Offensive360 if you need combined SAST and DAST in one platform, want a simple on-premise or air-gapped deployment via OVA, prefer predictable per-project pricing, or need AI-powered analysis for niche languages.

Choose Checkmarx if you need the broadest built-in language coverage, want a mature enterprise AppSec platform with SCA and secrets scanning, require deep IDE integration, or need a vendor with established analyst recognition.

Consider using both if you want Checkmarx for broad SAST coverage across your portfolio and Offensive360 for DAST and security-focused analysis of specific applications.

Assumptions to verify

  • Checkmarx One’s on-premise deployment options and pricing may have changed. Check their current offerings.
  • Checkmarx’s DAST capabilities (direct or via partnerships) should be verified on their current product page.
  • Specific language counts vary between CxSAST (on-prem) and Checkmarx One (cloud). Confirm which product you’d be evaluating.
  • Checkmarx’s AI-powered features are evolving rapidly. Verify current AI capabilities on their site.
  • Pricing for both products depends on organization size and negotiation. Request quotes from both vendors for accurate comparison.

Ready to see Offensive360 in action?

Try a free scan or book a walkthrough with our team.